Skip to main content

the yoga debate

In teaching Romans 14, and how we address questionable or disputed matters, I raised the question of yoga.  Is it okay for a Christian to participate in a yoga class?  Now, I need to keep in mind that not all yoga classes are the same, not all have the same emphasis on all the elements of traditional yoga.  This is an important point.   

But I do think the Apostle Paul's teaching on meat sacrificed to idols (1 Cor. 8-10) is an example of discerning how to respond to practices that have pagan elements.  

In 1 Corinthians chapters 8 through 10, the Apostle Paul deals at length with the topic of meat sacrificed to idols.  Often the meat and wine sold in Roman markets had been previously offered to a pagan deity at a local temple.  The question came up, can a Christian in good conscience eat such meat?  Here's my summary of Paul's answer, mainly in three principles from chapter 10:

1)  The meat itself remains unchanged by its being offered to an idol or false god.  Such food can still be eaten, because God gives them food for their nourishment and idols have no real existence.  Christians can buy meat at the market and don't have to live in superstitious fear.  (10:25-26)

2)  If however they learn that the meat was sacrificed to a god -- or they're having dinner with neighbors and it is announced that the food before them had been presented to a god -- then for conscience sake (mainly the consciences of those watching) they were to abstain from that meal due to their identification with Christ.  Christians are to live sensitively in regard to the conscience, both of ourselves and of others.  (10:27-29)

3)  They were definitely not to go the local temples and share in idolatrous sacrificial meals at the shrines, for this was to publicly declare that they were eating (i.e., having fellowship) at that god's table and so may actually be coming into demonic contact.   Christians are not to be foolish and live like pagans.  (10:19-22)

So, the question before us regarding the practice of yoga is, under which of the three principles above does yoga fit?

As to 1)... Stretching is an exercise, and exercise is good for the body.  I think everyone would agree with this.  

As to 3)... Yoga practiced as true yoga is a discipline intended to bring the mind and body into a spiritual awareness of oneness with the impersonal ground of being (i.e., that I am God).  If a class is truly a "yoga" class, it is inseparable from the religious worldview and practice of Hinduism.  The mantras used are often names of Hindu gods.  Christians should not partake in such practice.  

As to 2)... Is there a "yoga" possible that is comprised of exercise or stretching only, and that is not associated in some way with the Hindu worldview?  Is it possible to remove these elements?  If a yoga posture is to the body what a mantra is to the mind, then is it possible separate the two? Are the names, positions, and greetings -- even the pursuit of "mindfulness" -- possible without religious or spiritual connotation?   This seems to be the biggest point in the debate between Christians on this topic.   

Here are a few links that might be helpful.  These two articles -- here and here -- would say no, Christians should not be involved with any kind of yoga.

Two that would say it's okay when the Hindu elements are not involved are here and here.   

And finally, I find this interesting: here is an in-house debate on yoga's roots and whether they are religious or not, between Aseem Shukla and Deepak Chopra.

It's up to each of us to study, and be fully convinced in our own mind!  We should know not only what we believe, but why we believe it.    

Here are three resources that offer a great starting place to study Christian ethics:  Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics, John Frame's The Doctrine of the Christian Life, and Christian Personal Ethics by Carl F. H. Henry.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

clement quotes hebrews

Clement of Rome wrote to the church in Corinth around AD 90.  This is perhaps the same Clement, companion of Paul, mentioned in Philippians 4:3.  Many hold him to be the first bishop / pope in Rome, aka St. Clement I.   Clement quotes from the letter to the Hebrews.  Origin suggested that Clement was in fact the writer (as transcriber or amanuensis) of Hebrews.  Perhaps this letter began as a "word of exhortation" given by Paul at the synagogue (Heb 13:22; cf Acts 13:15) which then became a circular letter for the churches.  Other possible authors of Hebrews include Luke, Barnabas, or Apollos.  The theology is Pauline, but the transcriber is obviously second-generation (Heb. 2:3-4). At any rate, this early church leader in Rome, is already quoting Hebrews in his letter in AD 90:    CHAPTER 36  ALL BLESSINGS ARE GIVEN TO US THROUGH CHRIST This is the way, beloved, in which we find our Savior, even Jesus Christ,  the High Prie...

Howard Hendricks on OT books chronology

When I was in seminary, Howard Hendricks (aka "Prof") gave us a little card with the books of the OT chronologically arranged. The scanned copy I have was a bit blurry and I wanted to make something like this available for our church class in OT theology ("Story of Redemption"). A few minor edits and here it is...

sword and trowel

"From that day on, half of my servants worked on construction, and half held the spears, shields, bows, and coats of mail. And the leaders stood behind the whole house of Judah, who were building on the wall. Those who carried burdens were loaded in such a way that each labored on the work with one hand and held his weapon with the other. And each of the builders had his sword strapped at his side while he built. The man who sounded the trumpet was beside me." (Nehemiah 4:16-18 ESV) The great London preacher, Charles Spurgeon, published a monthly magazine called The Sword and The Trowel; A record of combat with sin and of labour for the Lord. It was published from 1865 to 1892. The cover of the journal had a drawing taken from Nehemiah 4, which included both a trowel (representing the work) and a sword (representing the fight). The sword was necessary to protect what the men with trowels were building. These citizen-soldier-builders would successfully complete the wall aroun...