I have begun reading What's Wrong with the World? by G. K. Chesterton (1910; Sophia Institute, 2021). Here's a highlight from the first chapter: "This is the arresting and dominant fact about modern social discussion; that the quarrel is not merely about the difficulties, but about the aim. We agree about the evil; it is about the good that we should tear each other's eyes out. We all admit that a lazy aristocracy is a bad thing. We should not by any means all admit that an active aristocracy would be a good thing. We all feel angry with an irreligious priesthood; but some of us would go mad with disgust at a really religious one. Everyone is indignant if our army is weak, including the people who would be even more indignant if it were strong. The social case is exactly the opposite of the medical case. We do not disagree, like doctors, about the precise nature of the illness, while agreeing about the nature of health. On the contrary, we all agree that England is un...
This is just a short post to recommend to all of you the benefits of being in a reading group . I guess you could also call that a "book club". I'm not sure there's really a difference. There were four of us, now three, who began eight years ago to meet every other week to read and discuss a book, from which we would read and discuss a few chapters at a time. Our pattern, along with the authors we chose, was loosely based upon the Oxford Inklings -- C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, Charles Williams, and their friends. That was the circle of literature we were interested in. To date we have read over thirty books , including works by Lewis, Chesterton, MacDonald, T. S. Eliot, and Boethius. Modern works included books by Alan Jacobs, Peter Kreeft, Thomas Howard, Harry Blamires, and Michael Ward. We also sampled poetry W. B. Yeats and Robert Frost. The benefit of a reading group is accountability, or at least some level of friendly accountability. To be sure, we all ...