Skip to main content

how (not) to be secular

I just finished a most enlightening and penetrating book on the nature of secularism -- what it is and how we got here.  It is James K. A. Smith's How (Not) To Be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor (Eerdmans, 2014).  Charles Taylor is author of the magisterial volume, A Secular Age, and Smith is making him accessible for folks like me, a sort of Cliff's Notes on Charles Taylor's book.  

Very, very helpful!  Here are some highlights to whet your interest... 

"Our age is haunted. On the one hand, we live under a brass heaven, ensconced in immanence. We live in the twilight of both gods and idols. But their ghosts have refused to depart, and every once in a while we might be surprised to find ourselves tempted by belief, by intimations of transcendence." 

"Most of us live in this cross-pressured space, where both our agnosticism and our devotion are mutually haunted and haunting..."

"But although we are more informed [than our ancestors], we are no more evolved, and certainly no more intelligent than them. What convinces us our knowledge is so final?" (Taylor)

"Ardor and devotion cannot undo the shift in plausibility structures that characterizes our age."

"I mean by this a humanism accepting no final goals beyond human flourishing, nor any allegiance to anything else beyond this flourishing."

"So the shift to a secular age not only makes exclusive humanism a live option for us, it also changes religious communities. We’re all secular now."

"It wasn’t enough for us to stop believing in the gods; we also had to be able to imagine significance within an immanent frame, to imagine modes of meaning that did not depend on transcendence."

"Significance no longer inheres in things; rather, meaning and significance are a property of minds who perceive meaning internally."

"The premodern self’s porosity means the self is essentially vulnerable (and hence also 'healable'). To be human is to be essentially open to an outside (whether benevolent or malevolent), open to blessing or curse, possession or grace."

"The modern self, in contrast to this premodern, porous self, is a buffered self, insulated and isolated in its interiority..."

"Because eternity is eclipsed, the this-worldly is amplified and threatens to swallow all."

"And so the 'god' that governs the cosmos is the architect of an impersonal order. In short, we’re all Masons now."

"We might describe this as 'deistic' religion — if it didn’t look like so much contemporary Protestantism."

"Sealed off from enchantment, the modern buffered self is also sealed off from significance, left to ruminate in a stew of its own ennui... Our insulation breeds a sense of cosmic isolation."

"Inscrutability is no longer an option; so if believers have no rationally demonstrative answer, but can only appeal to something like the 'hidden' will of God, then the scales tip in favor of what we know and understand."

"But in fact, their conversion to unbelief was also a conversion to a new faith: 'faith in science’s ability' ... Such conversions are conversions to a new authority, not the assumption of intellectual independence."

"The expressivist forges her own religion ('spirituality'), her own, personal Jesus." 

"Nothing is given or axiomatic anymore, so one has to 'find' one’s faith."

"In the name of securing our freedom, we swap submission to the priest for submission to the therapist."













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

clement quotes hebrews

Clement of Rome wrote to the church in Corinth around AD 90.  This is perhaps the same Clement, companion of Paul, mentioned in Philippians 4:3.  Many hold him to be the first bishop / pope in Rome, aka St. Clement I.   Clement quotes from the letter to the Hebrews.  Origin suggested that Clement was in fact the writer (as transcriber or amanuensis) of Hebrews.  Perhaps this letter began as a "word of exhortation" given by Paul at the synagogue (Heb 13:22; cf Acts 13:15) which then became a circular letter for the churches.  Other possible authors of Hebrews include Luke, Barnabas, or Apollos.  The theology is Pauline, but the transcriber is obviously second-generation (Heb. 2:3-4). At any rate, this early church leader in Rome, is already quoting Hebrews in his letter in AD 90:    CHAPTER 36  ALL BLESSINGS ARE GIVEN TO US THROUGH CHRIST This is the way, beloved, in which we find our Savior, even Jesus Christ,  the High Prie...

Howard Hendricks on OT books chronology

When I was in seminary, Howard Hendricks (aka "Prof") gave us a little card with the books of the OT chronologically arranged. The scanned copy I have was a bit blurry and I wanted to make something like this available for our church class in OT theology ("Story of Redemption"). A few minor edits and here it is...

sword and trowel

"From that day on, half of my servants worked on construction, and half held the spears, shields, bows, and coats of mail. And the leaders stood behind the whole house of Judah, who were building on the wall. Those who carried burdens were loaded in such a way that each labored on the work with one hand and held his weapon with the other. And each of the builders had his sword strapped at his side while he built. The man who sounded the trumpet was beside me." (Nehemiah 4:16-18 ESV) The great London preacher, Charles Spurgeon, published a monthly magazine called The Sword and The Trowel; A record of combat with sin and of labour for the Lord. It was published from 1865 to 1892. The cover of the journal had a drawing taken from Nehemiah 4, which included both a trowel (representing the work) and a sword (representing the fight). The sword was necessary to protect what the men with trowels were building. These citizen-soldier-builders would successfully complete the wall aroun...